You may have read and heard the current ‘conspiracy theories’ regarding the current swine flu pandemic. Conspiracy theories abound and cling like barnacles to every major and cataclysmic event. Many are plausible and some may be true to some extent. However, whether we take them with a pinch of salt or believe them rarely has any direct impact on our own lives. This one is different.
First, let’s look at facts that are not in dispute before we look at the associated theories:
1. This particular strain of swine flu emerged in Mexico and became a global pandemic in an extremely short space of time. This may not be impossible with today’s level of international travel and movement of people between nations… but it is unprecedented. Neither the bird flu nor the SARS viruses were quite the globetrotters that this strain of swine flu appears to be.
2. The vaccine will be used largely untested. Safety tests that normally take an average of eight weeks to complete were “fast tracked” over a period of five days. Even so, the reports of the safety tests will not be made available until after the vaccination program has commenced. Effectively, people will be injected with a vaccine for which no safety data is available.
3. Your government has no legal responsibility for the safety of the vaccine. Your government has a ‘Duty of Care’ and this extends to ensuring that vital health provisions such as vaccines are made available. They would only be accountable for ‘foreseeable’ injuries as failure to address such would be a neglect of the Duty of Care. However, as no safety data will be available, negative reactions to the vaccine would not be deemed foreseeable so your government would not be held to account in the event of illness, disability or death attributable to the vaccine.
4. The pharmaceutical companies producing the vaccine have been granted legal immunity to prosecution in the event of negative reactions to the vaccine in the US and in the UK. Other countries are expected to follow suit if they have not already done so. This means that, in the event of illness, disability or death attributable to the vaccine, no compensation will be awarded to either the victims or the victims’ families. No one is accountable by law.
This does not imply a great deal of confidence in the safety of the vaccine on the part of the government and the manufacturers. It may also imply that large numbers of negative reactions are expected and steps seem to have been taken to ensure that neither the government nor the manufacturers are impeded by a tsunami of compensation claims.
The particular conspiracy theory is that must be given some head space is that this is actually part of a global population reduction plan. The actual virus itself is not the perceived threat but the vaccine is believed to be contaminated by toxins that take long enough to begin taking effect to avoid being identified as a risk until some time after the vaccination program has been completed, by which time, it would be too late.
This may sound very far fetched but David Rockefella, Prince Philip and a number of people believed to be connected to the Bideberg group of alleged global ‘movers & shakers’ have made no secret of their concerns about the rate of global population expansion. The ever-diplomatic Prince Philip is the only one to date to publicly advocate the concept of a human cull. During an interview in which he discussed the necessity of culling in species in which the population expansion becomes unsustainable, he stated that he would wish to be “reincarnated as a deadly virus” and thus “contribute to the solution”.
‘Googling’ the term “human cull swine flu” will return a large number of sites in which this theory is expounded in varying levels of detail.
Although I am not advocating on behalf of the conspiracy theory, it is one that we cannot afford to simply dismiss.
Vaccines are always hazardous and should be accepted with caution. An example is the incident in 1976 in which a US serviceman allegedly contracted swine flu and subsequently died, sparking off the disastrous ‘knee-jerk’ reaction that led to 25 deaths and countless cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a potentially fatal inflammation of the nervous system, which can also cause paralysis. These were wholly attributable to the vaccine. The serviceman was the only death attributable to the virus.
There are many childhood illnesses and disabilities that have been caused by vaccines. When faced with the choice between a strong likelihood of contracting a seriously debilitating or fatal condition such as polio, smallpox and suchlike and a vaccine that can protect the child, the risks of vaccination are comparatively small but vaccination is always the ‘lesser of two evils’.
The current strain of swine flu has proved no more potent than seasonal flu, to which we are all prone and which, in itself, invariably claims lives to some degree. But the risks are comparatively slight and many prefer not to risk vaccination against seasonal flu. Any higher death rate with swine flu is more an indication of its global spread than its potency. In this instance, it is the virus that is the lesser of two evils.
If there is any substance to the Human Cull theory, this has obviously huge implications. We must not only protect ourselves from what would amount to summary, institutionalised execution but we must also do whatever we can to protect Humanity from what it would then become. Individually, the outcome would be death, an inevitability we all face at some point. The concept of a world subjected to such an unprecedented atrocity is far worse.
We need to prepare for the possibility of just such an atrocity. Above all, we must survive, not only to prolong our own transient time on this earth but also to do all we can to save Humanity itself from such an unthinkable dominion.
Yes. We must all endeavour to tap into whatever sources are currently beyond us and beyond the darkest possibilities we may face. But this might not be achievable by meditation and simply thinking along New Age lines alone. We may have to decide what we would do in the event that vaccinations become mandatory. Penalties are unlikely to be limited to fines if the theory has any substance. We may well face incarceration or ‘quarantine’ and be subjected to vaccination by physical force.
What do we do if, in order to protect our loved ones and ourselves, we must take to the hills? Then what? How would we co-ordinate a counteraction?
I certainly have no answers but we cannot simply ignore the imminent possibility. We need to discuss this with friends and family, draw up contingency plans and prepare for the unthinkable. Annihilation is the least we may have to face. It is the world that would survive that we have to protect.
Don’t panic and don’t walk in fear but be mindful of where we are going and stick to your path.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and I look forward to any comments that this discussion may raise.